END-OF-COURSE RATINGS
HIS-202-01
Modern Latin America
Fall 2006

Q1. The course sessions were conducted in a manner that helped me to understand the subject matter of the course.

a. Slightly Agree. No comment.
b. Moderately Agree. No comment.
c. Strongly Agree. No comment.
d. Strongly Agree. I like the way you organize notes on the board.
e. Strongly Agree. Discussions usually effectively covered the readings. Continue to make clarifications when classes start to go astray.
f. (Read Scale Wrong! See comments.) Strongly Disagree. I really liked the discussions we had, and especially the oral participation component to the class, which encouraged a wide variety of people to participate.
g. Strongly Agree. I wish this was a 2 hour class.
h. Strongly Agree. No comment.
i. Strongly Agree. No comment.
j. Moderately Agree. Would like to see more lecture.
k. Moderately Agree. Mostly good. Sometimes questions didn’t get the answers you were looking for or threw me off.
l. Moderately Agree. We covered the basic points of each reading in class.
m. Strongly Agree. No comment.
n. Strongly Agree. Lecture/discussion is a good way to provide the information.
o. Strongly Agree. Good mix of lecture and discussion.
p. Strongly Agree. We always went over, discussed and analyzed the assigned reading.
q. Strongly Agree. Engaged and helpful discussions/Question-and-answer sessions. Some times (?formulated?)
r. Moderately Agree. I’m glad that the course sessions rely on student participation, and that you step in quite nimbly when we reach a standstill . . . However, it would be helpful if you more consistently set aside the last few minutes for synthesis. Sometimes, we were just getting in to “the good stuff.”
s. Strongly Agree. Good mix of discussion and lecture.
t. Strongly Agree. No comment.
u. Slightly Disagree. Too much class discussion.
v. Moderately Agree. Discussing the readings each day is helpful.

Return to Evaluation Questions
Return to Silva's Home Page