INTRODUCTION TO SOCIOLOGY

Sociology 111.02
Chris Hunter
Fall, 2004
Carnegie 114
MWF 1:00-2:05 ARH 120
Ext. 3135

Course Description

Sociology is concerned with the inter-relationships among individuals and the social structures and groups to which they belong.  As you become familiar with sociological inquiry, you should develop more appreciation for the complexity of social life.  You will also come to see that individual behavior is not so individual as we sometimes suppose; rather, how we think, act, and feel has a lot to do with the group norms and social structures around us, structures for which we ourselves are only somewhat responsible.

The course uses six case studies to examine these issues, rather than a typical introductory textbook.  The first three case studies offer differing perspectives on disasters. First, we will examine the growth of community and culture, and their possible destruction, through an analysis of the community of Buffalo Creek, and of the flood that helped destroy it.  Second, we will examine reasons the Chicago heat wave of 1995 had very different impacts in neighborhoods whose residents differed in socio-economic status and race.  Third, we will look at the operation of a mountain search and rescue team whose members have to deal with emotionally draining work and emotionally traumatized victims. 

The next two cases focus on urban education, race, gender, and future success.  First, we will examine poverty, social class, and race through an ethnographic study of male adolescents growing up in a low-income housing project in Chicago.  Second, we will examine the disparate school experiences of boys and girls from the Dominican Republic in a parallel ethnographic study, set in New York City.  In each case, we will be interested in the connections between "public issues" and "personal troubles" which these cases illustrate and in how those connections help illuminate our own social experiences.

Finally, since the course otherwise focuses on the nature of some social problems in the United States, we will end by examining options for positive social change through democratic community organizing.

Course Format

Many of the important things you can learn in this class will come from listening and talking to other students, so the class is designed to promote interaction and exchange.  Most class meetings will combine brief lectures with small- and large-group discussion.  I expect everyone to contribute to discussion — so you need to read carefully and think about the material before each class and you need to speak up in class.  I also expect people to listen to each other, which requires patience, a sense of humor, and mutual respect. 

To help you prepare for discussions and exercises, I will distribute discussion questions on some of the readings, which you should complete on your own and bring to class.  During classes we frequently will divide into small groups to consider these questions.  Working in small groups is a particularly useful experience in a sociology class, given that group behavior is a focus of sociological study.  Other classes will feature games or simulations or presentations or videos, with a variety of class activities designed to be fun and to encourage your active engagement in what goes on.

Objectives for Individual Learning

  1. To become familiar with the kinds of questions sociologists typically ask, the kinds of research methods sociologists use to answer those questions, and the kinds of theories they use to interpret their research findings.
  2. To understand sociological perspectives on how social structures and cultures in their diversity serve both to facilitate and to constrain people’s actions and interactions.
  3. To use sociological perspectives in examining the major institutions of contemporary societies, such as families, education, and the government.
  4. To use sociological perspectives in examining issues of social policy, especially issues relating to inequality and diversity.
  5. To begin to see one’s own life and experiences through a sociological lens.
  6. To improve one’s skills in writing, critical thinking, oral presentation, and class discussion.

Course Requirements

  1. REACTION & EXCHANGE PROJECT (20 percent).  This on-going project allows you to reflect on and creatively apply ideas from readings and class discussions to your own life and to the world around you.  You may choose one of two options for this project:  either keeping a journal throughout the semester or participating in a discussion group that will meet regularly outside of class.  Both formats involve weekly informal writing, evaluated without letter grades, and the opportunity to engage our subject matter beyond the classroom.
  2. DATA-ANALYSIS PROJECT (10 percent).  Pairs of students will work together to analyze quantitative sociological data using the MicroCase/ShowCase statistical package.  Each pair will write a brief report describing their methodology, findings, and conclusions.
  3. MIDSEMESTER EXAM (10 percent).  The midsem will be a short take-home essay exam that will focus on basic sociological ideas and vocabulary, and on the first case studies.
  4. SHORT ESSAYS (30 percent).  You will write three short (3-4 page) papers during the semester that will focus on the case studies.  You will have the option of writing these as letters to the authors of those studies, or as more traditional analytic papers.  In either case, you may rewrite the papers if you desire.  I will average the grade on the first attempt and on any rewrite to arrive at the grade for the paper.  I have listed six such papers: everyone will do the first paper, plus two of the other three. 
  5. FINAL EXAM (20 percent).  The final exam will be either an in-class exam, with questions provided in advance, or a take-home essay exam.
  6. CLASS PARTICIPATION & ATTENDANCE (10 percent).

I am particularly eager to help students improve their writing.  If you are concerned about the adequacy of your writing, I strongly recommend that you see me to discuss your papers and that you go to the Writing Lab for advice on writing.  I will read your papers for both content and style (and will grade accordingly, explicitly or implicitly using the "paper grading criteria" attached below).

You must abide by the rules on honesty in academic work, outlined in the Student Handbook (pp. 11-14), which require you to "acknowledge explicitly any expressions, ideas, or observations that are not" your own.  I take your obligation to acknowledge sources very seriously and I expect you will do so as well.  In addition, I require that every paper contain a footnote acknowledging any assistance of any kind you received in producing the paper.  In the case of cooperatively produced work, you must indicate who produced which part of the data or product.  If you are unsure of your obligations about acknowledging sources, please see me.  For citations of sources in papers, I will accept any commonly used footnote or reference style, but I strongly recommend you use the American Sociological Association reference style, described later in this syllabus.  I will grade down any late work, unless you request permission for the lateness and I grant it before the due date.

Summary of Course Requirements and Grading

Reaction & Exchange Project 20% of grade
Data-analysis Paper 10% of grade
Mid-Semester Exam 10% of grade
Short Essays (3) 30% of grade
Final Exam 20% of grade
Class Participation 10% of grade

Required Books [listed in the order we’ll read them]

Erikson, Kai.  1976.  Everything in its Path:  Destruction of Community in the Buffalo Creek Flood. New York: Simon and Schuster.

Klinenberg, Eric.  2002.  Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago.  Chicago:  Chicago.

Lois, Jennifer2003.  Heroic Efforts: The Emotional Culture of Search & Rescue Volunteers. New York: NYU.

MacLeod, Jay.  1995. Ain’t No Makin’ It:  Aspirations and Attainment in a Low-Income Neighborhood.  Boulder:  Westview.

Lopez, Nancy. 2003.  Hopeful Girls, Troubled Boys.  New York: Routledge

Wood, Richard.  2002.  Faith in Action:  Religion, Race, and Democratic Organizing in America. Chicago: U Chicago Press.

Schedule of Assignments

DATE

TOPICS

READINGS

ASSIGNMENTS

       

Aug 27

Introduction to the Course

   

Aug 30

The Sociological Imagination

   

Sept 1

The Buffalo Creek Flood

Erikson Part One "February 26, 1972" 9-48

Video [in class] "Buffalo Creek"

Sept 3

Social Structure in Buffalo Creek

Erikson Part Two "Notes on Appalachia" 51-78

 
       

Sept 6

The Flood and After

Erikson Part Two "The Mountain Ethos" 79-93

 

Sept 8

Culture in Buffalo Creek

Erikson Part Two "The Coming of the Coal Camps" 94-114

Erikson Part Two "Buffalo Creek" 115-132

 

Sept 10

Coping with Change:  The Human Impact of Disaster

Erikson Part Three "Looking for Scars" 135-155

Erikson Part Three "Individual Trauma" 155-185

 
       

Sept 13

Coping with Change:  Community and the Loss of Community

Erikson Part Three "Collective Trauma" 186-245

Erikson "Conclusion" 246-259

 

Sept 15

Sociological Theories

Theory Handout

 

Sept 17

The Chicago Heat Wave

Klinenberg “Dying Alone” 1-78

Essay 1:  on/to Erikson

       

Sept 20

Race, Place, & Vulnerability

Klinenberg “The Ecology of Support” 2: 79-128

 

Sept 22

Government’s Role

Klinenberg “Governing” 3:129-164

 

Sept 24

Representing Catastrophe

Klinenberg “News” 4,5: 165-224

 
       

Sept 27

Critique & Comparisons

Klinenberg “Dangers” 6,7: 225-242

 

Sept 29

DATA ANALYSIS PROJECT

   

Oct 1

DATA ANALYSIS PROJECT

 

Essay 2:  on/to Klinenberg

       

Oct 4

Reflections on Doing Social Research

Lois “Intro” 1:1-43

Data Analysis Paper

Oct 6

Doing Rescue Work

Lois “Joining” 2,3: 44-84

 

Oct 8

Emotions on the job

Lois “Dealing with Crisis” 4: 85-113

 
       

Oct 11

Emotions & others

Lois “Others in Crisis” 5: 114-143

 

Oct 13

Emotions & the role or “rescuer”

Lois “Rewards” 6,8: 144-196

 

Oct 15

NO CLASS

 

Midsem Exam Due

       

Oct 16-24

FALL BREAK

   

Oct 25

Continuing Significance of Social Class

MacLeod "Social Immobility" 1: 3-10

Video [in class] "Crossing Lines"

Oct 27

Theorizing about Class

MacLeod "Social Reproduction" 2: 11-24

Essay 3:  on/to Lois

Oct 29

Poverty & Family/ Work/ School

MacLeod "Teenagers in Clarendon Heights" 3: 25-49

MacLeod "The Influence of the Family" 4: 50-59

 
       

Nov 1

Poverty & Work

MacLeod "The World of Work" 5: 61-82

 

Nov 3

Social Reproduction

MacLeod "School" 6: 83-111

MacLeod "Leveled Aspirations" 7: 112-134

 

Nov 5

Social Reproduction

MacLeod "Reproduction Theory Revisited" 8: 135-149

Essay 4:  on/to MacLeod

       

Nov 8

Status Attainment, Poverty, & Race

MacLeod "Eight Years Later" 155-269

 

Nov 10

Race & Gender Disparity in Urban Education

Lopez “Unequal Schooling” 1,2:1-38

 

Nov 12

 

Lopez “Urban High Schools” 3:39-66

 
       

Nov 15

Boys

Lopez “Problem Boys” 4:67-88

 

Nov 17

Girls

Lopez “Hopeful Girls” 5, 6:89-140

 

Nov 19

Afterwards

Lopez “After Graduation” 7,8:141-174

Essay 5:  on/to Lopez

       

Nov 22

Organizing for Change

Wood Intro, 1: 1-54

 

Nov 24

Faith-based Organizing

Wood “Religion & Politics” 2:55-88

 

Nov 26

THANKSGIVING BREAK

   
       

Nov 29

Race-Based Organizing

Wood “Organizing” 3, 4: 89-152

 

Dec 1

Cultural Dynamics

Wood “Cultural Dynamics” 5,6:153-218

 

Dec 3

NO CLASS

Take a breath!

 
       

Dec 6

What works?

Wood “Democracy” 7,8:219-280

Essay 6:  on/to Wood

Dec 8

     

Dec 10

CONCLUSIONS

   
       

Dec 17

FINAL EXAM [Friday, 9:00 AM]

We will almost certainly have a take-home exam and it will be due earlier than this.

Final Exam Scheduled


TYPICAL PAPER GRADING CRITERIA

Points: 

 
 

4 = Superior  

 

3 = Good  

 

2 = Mediocre  

 

1 = Deficient

 

CONTENT   [Content is double weighted in determining the final grade.]

        

Attention to the Assignment.  Does the paper contain (within the page limit) all the elements specified in the assignment?

        

Argument.  Does the paper have a main point?  Does the paper expand on that main point with a clear and logical progression of ideas ?  Do the introduction and conclusion frame the paper adequately? 

        

Evidence.  Is the argument supported by an adequate number of concrete facts and vivid details?  Are points well enough developed to be convincing?

        

Accuracy.  Does the paper correctly present and interpret information from its sources?

        

Total for Content.

   

WRITING STYLE

        

Words.  Are all words spelled correctly and chosen wisely?  Has the writer avoided jargon?

        

Sentences.  Are grammar and syntax correct?  Are the sentences concise?  Can the reader easily understand what is being said?

        

Paragraph Organization.  Are sentences varied in length and smoothly connected?  Are paragraphs unified, coherent, and fully developed?  Does the paper flow smoothly from beginning to end?  Does the writer avoid unnecessary repetition of information or ideas?

        

Mechanics.  Is any bibliographic information correct and correctly presented?  Is there an informative title?  Does the writer give credit for help received?

        

Total for Writing Style.

        

Total Score for Paper [(2 x Content) / Style]

        

Grade for Paper


Grinnell College | Sociology Department
This page last modified September 2, 2004