INTRODUCTION
TO SOCIOLOGY
| Sociology
111.02 |
Chris
Hunter
|
| Fall,
2004 |
Carnegie
114
|
| MWF
1:00-2:05 ARH 120 |
Ext.
3135
|
Course
Description
Sociology
is concerned with the inter-relationships among individuals and the social
structures and groups to which they belong. As you become familiar with
sociological inquiry, you should develop more appreciation for the complexity
of social life. You will also come to see that individual behavior is
not so individual as we sometimes suppose; rather, how we think, act,
and feel has a lot to do with the group norms and social structures around
us, structures for which we ourselves are only somewhat responsible.
The
course uses six case studies to examine these issues, rather than a typical
introductory textbook. The first three case studies offer differing perspectives
on disasters. First, we will examine the growth of community and culture,
and their possible destruction, through an analysis of the community of
Buffalo Creek, and of the flood that helped destroy it. Second, we will
examine reasons the Chicago heat wave of 1995 had very different impacts
in neighborhoods whose residents differed in socio-economic status and
race. Third, we will look at the operation of a mountain search and rescue
team whose members have to deal with emotionally draining work and emotionally
traumatized victims.
The
next two cases focus on urban education, race, gender, and future success.
First, we will examine poverty, social class, and race through an ethnographic
study of male adolescents growing up in a low-income housing project in
Chicago. Second, we will examine the disparate school experiences of
boys and girls from the Dominican Republic in a parallel ethnographic
study, set in New York City. In each case, we will be interested in the
connections between "public issues" and "personal troubles"
which these cases illustrate and in how those connections help illuminate
our own social experiences.
Finally,
since the course otherwise focuses on the nature of some social problems
in the United States, we will end by examining options for positive social
change through democratic community organizing.
Course
Format
Many
of the important things you can learn in this class will come from listening
and talking to other students, so the class is designed to promote interaction
and exchange. Most class meetings will combine brief lectures with small-
and large-group discussion. I expect everyone to contribute to discussion
— so you need to read carefully and think about the material before each
class and you need to speak up in class. I also expect people to listen
to each other, which requires patience, a sense of humor, and mutual respect.
To
help you prepare for discussions and exercises, I will distribute discussion
questions on some of the readings, which you should complete on your own
and bring to class. During classes we frequently will divide into small
groups to consider these questions. Working in small groups is a particularly
useful experience in a sociology class, given that group behavior is a
focus of sociological study. Other classes will feature games or simulations
or presentations or videos, with a variety of class activities designed
to be fun and to encourage your active engagement in what goes on.
Objectives
for Individual Learning
- To become
familiar with the kinds of questions sociologists typically ask, the
kinds of research methods sociologists use to answer those questions,
and the kinds of theories they use to interpret their research findings.
- To understand
sociological perspectives on how social structures and cultures in their
diversity serve both to facilitate and to constrain people’s actions
and interactions.
- To use
sociological perspectives in examining the major institutions of contemporary
societies, such as families, education, and the government.
- To use
sociological perspectives in examining issues of social policy, especially
issues relating to inequality and diversity.
- To begin
to see one’s own life and experiences through a sociological lens.
- To improve
one’s skills in writing, critical thinking, oral presentation, and class
discussion.
Course
Requirements
- REACTION
& EXCHANGE PROJECT (20 percent). This on-going project allows
you to reflect on and creatively apply ideas from readings and class
discussions to your own life and to the world around you. You may choose
one of two options for this project: either keeping a journal throughout
the semester or participating in a discussion group that will meet regularly
outside of class. Both formats involve weekly informal writing, evaluated
without letter grades, and the opportunity to engage our subject matter
beyond the classroom.
- DATA-ANALYSIS
PROJECT (10 percent). Pairs of students will work together to analyze
quantitative sociological data using the MicroCase/ShowCase statistical
package. Each pair will write a brief report describing their methodology,
findings, and conclusions.
- MIDSEMESTER
EXAM (10 percent). The midsem will be a short take-home essay exam
that will focus on basic sociological ideas and vocabulary, and on the
first case studies.
- SHORT
ESSAYS (30 percent). You will write three short (3-4 page) papers
during the semester that will focus on the case studies. You will have
the option of writing these as letters to the authors of those studies,
or as more traditional analytic papers. In either case, you may rewrite
the papers if you desire. I will average the grade on the first attempt
and on any rewrite to arrive at the grade for the paper. I have listed
six such papers: everyone will do the first paper, plus two of the other
three.
- FINAL
EXAM (20 percent). The final exam will be either an in-class exam,
with questions provided in advance, or a take-home essay exam.
- CLASS
PARTICIPATION & ATTENDANCE (10 percent).
I
am particularly eager to help students improve their writing. If you
are concerned about the adequacy of your writing, I strongly recommend
that you see me to discuss your papers and that you go to the Writing
Lab for advice on writing. I will read your papers for both content and
style (and will grade accordingly, explicitly or implicitly using the
"paper grading criteria" attached below).
You
must abide by the rules on honesty in academic work, outlined in the
Student Handbook (pp. 11-14), which require you to "acknowledge
explicitly any expressions, ideas, or observations that are not"
your own. I take your obligation to acknowledge sources very seriously
and I expect you will do so as well. In addition, I require that every
paper contain a footnote acknowledging any assistance of any kind
you received in producing the paper. In the case of cooperatively produced
work, you must indicate who produced which part of the data or product.
If you are unsure of your obligations about acknowledging sources, please
see me. For citations of sources in papers, I will accept any commonly
used footnote or reference style, but I strongly recommend you use the
American Sociological Association reference style, described later in
this syllabus. I will grade down any late work, unless you
request permission for the lateness and I grant it before
the due date.
Summary
of Course Requirements and Grading
| Reaction
& Exchange Project |
20%
of grade |
| Data-analysis
Paper |
10%
of grade |
| Mid-Semester
Exam |
10%
of grade |
| Short
Essays (3) |
30%
of grade |
| Final
Exam |
20%
of grade |
| Class
Participation |
10%
of grade |
Required
Books [listed in the order we’ll read them]
Erikson,
Kai. 1976. Everything in its Path: Destruction of Community in the
Buffalo Creek Flood. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Klinenberg,
Eric. 2002. Heat Wave: A Social Autopsy of Disaster in Chicago.
Chicago: Chicago.
Lois, Jennifer.
2003. Heroic Efforts: The Emotional Culture of Search & Rescue
Volunteers. New York: NYU.
MacLeod,
Jay. 1995. Ain’t No Makin’ It: Aspirations and Attainment in a Low-Income
Neighborhood. Boulder: Westview.
Lopez, Nancy.
2003. Hopeful Girls, Troubled Boys. New York: Routledge
Wood, Richard.
2002. Faith in Action: Religion, Race, and Democratic Organizing
in America. Chicago: U Chicago Press.
Schedule
of Assignments
|
|
DATE
|
TOPICS
|
READINGS
|
ASSIGNMENTS
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Aug
27
|
Introduction
to the Course
|
|
|
|
Aug
30
|
The
Sociological Imagination
|
|
|
|
Sept
1
|
The
Buffalo Creek Flood
|
Erikson
Part One "February 26, 1972" 9-48
|
Video
[in class] "Buffalo Creek"
|
|
Sept
3
|
Social
Structure in Buffalo Creek
|
Erikson
Part Two "Notes on Appalachia" 51-78
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Sept
6
|
The
Flood and After
|
Erikson
Part Two "The Mountain Ethos" 79-93
|
|
|
Sept
8
|
Culture
in Buffalo Creek
|
Erikson
Part Two "The Coming of the Coal Camps" 94-114
Erikson
Part Two "Buffalo Creek" 115-132
|
|
|
Sept
10
|
Coping
with Change: The Human Impact of Disaster
|
Erikson
Part Three "Looking for Scars" 135-155
Erikson
Part Three "Individual Trauma" 155-185
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Sept
13
|
Coping
with Change: Community and the Loss of Community
|
Erikson
Part Three "Collective Trauma" 186-245
Erikson
"Conclusion" 246-259
|
|
|
Sept
15
|
Sociological
Theories
|
Theory
Handout
|
|
|
Sept
17
|
The
Chicago Heat Wave
|
Klinenberg
“Dying Alone” 1-78
|
Essay
1: on/to Erikson
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Sept
20
|
Race,
Place, & Vulnerability
|
Klinenberg
“The Ecology of Support” 2: 79-128
|
|
|
Sept
22
|
Government’s
Role
|
Klinenberg
“Governing” 3:129-164
|
|
|
Sept
24
|
Representing
Catastrophe
|
Klinenberg
“News” 4,5: 165-224
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Sept
27
|
Critique
& Comparisons
|
Klinenberg
“Dangers” 6,7: 225-242
|
|
|
Sept
29
|
DATA
ANALYSIS PROJECT
|
|
|
|
Oct
1
|
DATA
ANALYSIS PROJECT
|
|
Essay
2: on/to Klinenberg
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Oct
4
|
Reflections
on Doing Social Research
|
Lois
“Intro” 1:1-43
|
Data
Analysis Paper
|
|
Oct
6
|
Doing
Rescue Work
|
Lois
“Joining” 2,3: 44-84
|
|
|
Oct
8
|
Emotions
on the job
|
Lois
“Dealing with Crisis” 4: 85-113
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Oct
11
|
Emotions
& others
|
Lois
“Others in Crisis” 5: 114-143
|
|
|
Oct
13
|
Emotions
& the role or “rescuer”
|
Lois
“Rewards” 6,8: 144-196
|
|
|
Oct
15
|
NO
CLASS
|
|
Midsem
Exam Due
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Oct
16-24
|
FALL
BREAK
|
|
|
|
Oct
25
|
Continuing
Significance of Social Class
|
MacLeod
"Social Immobility" 1: 3-10
|
Video
[in class] "Crossing Lines"
|
|
Oct
27
|
Theorizing
about Class
|
MacLeod
"Social Reproduction" 2: 11-24
|
Essay
3: on/to Lois
|
|
Oct
29
|
Poverty
& Family/ Work/ School
|
MacLeod
"Teenagers in Clarendon Heights" 3: 25-49
MacLeod
"The Influence of the Family" 4: 50-59
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Nov
1
|
Poverty
& Work
|
MacLeod
"The World of Work" 5: 61-82
|
|
|
Nov
3
|
Social
Reproduction
|
MacLeod
"School" 6: 83-111
MacLeod
"Leveled Aspirations" 7: 112-134
|
|
|
Nov
5
|
Social
Reproduction
|
MacLeod
"Reproduction Theory Revisited" 8: 135-149
|
Essay
4: on/to MacLeod
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Nov
8
|
Status
Attainment, Poverty, & Race
|
MacLeod
"Eight Years Later" 155-269
|
|
|
Nov
10
|
Race
& Gender Disparity in Urban Education
|
Lopez
“Unequal Schooling” 1,2:1-38
|
|
|
Nov
12
|
|
Lopez
“Urban High Schools” 3:39-66
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Nov
15
|
Boys
|
Lopez
“Problem Boys” 4:67-88
|
|
|
Nov
17
|
Girls
|
Lopez
“Hopeful Girls” 5, 6:89-140
|
|
|
Nov
19
|
Afterwards
|
Lopez
“After Graduation” 7,8:141-174
|
Essay
5: on/to Lopez
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Nov
22
|
Organizing
for Change
|
Wood
Intro, 1: 1-54
|
|
|
Nov
24
|
Faith-based
Organizing
|
Wood
“Religion & Politics” 2:55-88
|
|
|
Nov
26
|
THANKSGIVING
BREAK
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Nov
29
|
Race-Based
Organizing
|
Wood
“Organizing” 3, 4: 89-152
|
|
|
Dec
1
|
Cultural
Dynamics
|
Wood
“Cultural Dynamics” 5,6:153-218
|
|
|
Dec
3
|
NO
CLASS
|
Take
a breath!
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Dec
6
|
What
works?
|
Wood
“Democracy” 7,8:219-280
|
Essay
6: on/to Wood
|
|
Dec
8
|
|
|
|
|
Dec
10
|
CONCLUSIONS
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
Dec
17
|
FINAL
EXAM [Friday, 9:00 AM]
|
We
will almost certainly have a take-home exam and it will be due earlier
than this.
|
Final
Exam Scheduled
|
TYPICAL
PAPER GRADING CRITERIA
|
Points:
|
|
| |
4
= Superior
|
| |
3
= Good
|
| |
2
= Mediocre
|
| |
1
= Deficient
|
|
CONTENT [Content
is double weighted in determining the final grade.]
|
|
|
Attention to
the Assignment. Does the paper contain (within the page limit)
all the elements specified in the assignment?
|
|
|
Argument. Does
the paper have a main point? Does the paper expand on that main
point with a clear and logical progression of ideas ? Do the introduction
and conclusion frame the paper adequately?
|
|
|
Evidence. Is
the argument supported by an adequate number of concrete facts and
vivid details? Are points well enough developed to be convincing?
|
|
|
Accuracy. Does
the paper correctly present and interpret information from its sources?
|
|
|
Total for
Content.
|
| |
|
|
WRITING
STYLE
|
|
|
Words. Are all
words spelled correctly and chosen wisely? Has the writer avoided
jargon?
|
|
|
Sentences. Are
grammar and syntax correct? Are the sentences concise? Can the
reader easily understand what is being said?
|
|
|
Paragraph Organization.
Are sentences varied in length and smoothly connected? Are paragraphs
unified, coherent, and fully developed? Does the paper flow smoothly
from beginning to end? Does the writer avoid unnecessary repetition
of information or ideas?
|
|
|
Mechanics. Is
any bibliographic information correct and correctly presented?
Is there an informative title? Does the writer give credit for
help received?
|
|
|
Total for
Writing Style.
|
|
|
Total Score
for Paper [(2 x Content) / Style]
|
|
|
Grade for
Paper
|
Grinnell
College | Sociology Department
This page last modified
September 2, 2004
|