CONTEMPORARY
SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY
Fall
2002
|
Sociology
285.01
|
Chris
Hunter
|
|
Tues-Thurs 8:30-9:50
|
Carnegie 114
|
|
Fine 152
|
ext.
3135
|
Overview
This
course examines the background assumptions, conceptual adequacy, logical
consistency, and empirical testability of major theoretical perspectives
in sociology. We will gain an overview of these perspectives by reading
a textbook on theory, encounter the theories more directly in short selections
from the original works, and explore a variety of applications of these
theories in essays by contemporary sociologists.
In
this course, we will focus mainly on contemporary theories and theorists,
though we will also study many of the classical theorists in order to
provide background on current theories. Our concern throughout the course
will be to apply specific theories to real-world issues. In papers, discussions,
and class presentations, we will grapple with the challenging theoretical
problems that have emerged as sociologists have sought to articulate their
theories and use them to explain the complexities of social structures
and social interaction.
Objectives
for Individual Learning
- To gain familiarity
with a broad range of sociological theories and with the work of a variety
of currently active theorists.
- To appreciate the
importance of theory for making sense of the social world around us.
- To develop your
"tastes" in sociological theory, so that you not only prefer
one theory to another, but can explain and defend the reasons for your
preference.
- To develop your
standards of evaluation for theories, by selecting and using appropriate
criteria to compare the conceptual adequacy, logical consistency, and
empirical testability of at least two theories, both of which can be
applied to the same sociological context.
- To develop your
theoretical creativity, by exploring applications of theories to everyday
life, and by suggesting modifications and extensions of the theories
studied.
- To gain facility
in writing understandable prose about abstract and challenging subjects.
- To gain facility
in presenting and discussing complex sociological ideas in class.
Responsibilities
to Classmates
- To serve at least
twice as a resource person helping others in the class to interpret
and criticize the assigned reading selections.
- Work with other
students and the instructor, to plan and lead classroom presentations
on at least two assigned readings, as well as making a presentation
on your final essay.
- To contribute
to the environment for learning in the classroom by reading the assigned
material when it is due, coming to class prepared for discussion, and
striving to stay mentally focused in class.
- To cooperate with
classmates to make sure that books, articles, and other library resources
are freely available to everyone
Course Design:
Inescapably,
much of the reading in this course is hard — we will read some of the
most difficult selections that sociology majors are asked to tackle.
To help you master this challenging material, the course design encourages
active participation in class discussions, gives students substantial
responsibility for leading class discussions, and demands a considerable
amount of reflective writing about the texts. By reading the selections
carefully, discussing difficult concepts with classmates, explaining complex
theoretical ideas in class presentations, and putting your reflections
about theory on paper, you can come to know these powerful intellectual
perspectives well enough to enhance your own understandings of social
life.
Careful
reading will be our first priority. Approximately 100 to 200 pages of
readings are assigned per week. The assignments bunch considerably, so
please plan your reading accordingly. A helpful technique in preparing
for class discussions is to take notes on the readings, focusing on the
author's central argument and noting anything that seems unclear. Please
bring to each class session one written question for discussion;
we will frequently begin our class meetings by writing our questions on
the board to generate topics for discussion. Providing these discussion
questions will contribute to your class participation grade.
Sociology
285 is conducted as a seminar: I will participate in discussion but will
not lecture, except to offer mini-lectures on occasion to get us started.
Therefore, you must come to each class prepared to discuss the topics
covered in the assigned readings. Since the success of this course depends
on active participation, class participation figures heavily in your grade.
To
encourage your active involvement in class discussions, each of
you will act as a resource person for at least two of the required readings.
The selections from which you may choose are indicated by "R"
on the syllabus. As a resource person, your role is to study this article
with particular care and be ready to help others understand it. You may
want to produce outlines, diagrams, definitions of key terms, or anything
else that clarifies the reading.
To
help the class cope with some of the most challenging articles, you
will team up at least twice with other students to make a class presentation
on one of the required readings. Articles suitable for presentations
are indicated by "P" on the syllabus. This role will
involve offering introductory comments along with a written synopsis of
the article and of your reactions to it (to be made available to the class)
and then helping to lead discussion. Your overall course participation,
which includes contributing to class discussions, acting as a resource
person, and making these team presentations, will count for 30 percent
of your grade.
Expressing
your reactions in writing, like reading carefully and participating actively
in class discussions, can greatly facilitate your understanding of difficult
material. You will write four short (3-5 page) reading memos
(described on the last page of this syllabus). In each of these short
papers, you will analyze some interesting or problematic aspect of a theorist’s
work. You will have some discretion about the due dates for these memos,
but everyone will need to complete three memos before Break, and
the assignments together will count for 40 percent of your grade.
I
will permit you — in fact, I strongly encourage you — to rewrite your
reading memos, but before attempting to do so, you must schedule with
a meeting with me to discuss the memo in question and how to rewrite
it. You will benefit most from a rewrite done soon after the first try,
so the deadline for doing any rewrite will be two weeks after the original
submission.
A
coursework and class participation portfolio will be due in late
April. Your portfolio will collect the drafts (including all revisions)
of your reading memos, together with materials documenting your class
presentations (including your daily discussion questions) and resource
duties. The portfolio will also require a self-evaluation of the progress
you have made toward reaching the course goals for individual learning
(see above). A preliminary portfolio will be due just before spring break.
Your
final written assignment will be a longer paper that compares two
theoretical perspectives in detail. During the last weeks of
the semester, each of you will act as presenter of your own final
paper and as critic of someone else's final paper.
In this longer paper (from fifteen to twenty pages), you will present
information from your reading of original and secondary sources to argue
for the superiority of one of the two perspectives. A proposal for this
paper is due on October 31. A first draft of the paper will be
due in the last two weeks of classes, as will a class presentation
and discussion of it. A mandatory rewrite of this final paper
will be due about ten days after the draft. Your instructor will provide
written comments on the draft version and will grade only the final version.
This longer paper and presentation will count for 30 percent of your grade.
Summary of Assignments
and Grading
- Class participation
(includes writing discussion questions, acting as a resource person
for articles, making joint presentations on articles, and participating
actively in class discussions) — 30%
- Four reading
memos and revisions (with 3 completed before Break) — 40 %
- Final paper and
presentation — 30%
Required
Texts:
Kivisto,
Peter, ed. 2001. Illuminating Social Life: Classical and Contemporary
Theory Revisited. Second edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge. [LIFE]
Kivisto,
Peter, ed. 2000. Social Theory: Roots and Branches. Los Angeles:
Roxbury. [ROOTS]
Lengermann,
Patricia Madoo, and Jill Niebrugge-Brantley. 1998. The Women Founders:
Sociology and Social Theory 1830-1930. Boston: McGraw Hill. [FOUNDERS]
Wallace,
Ruth A., and Alison Wolf. 1999. Contemporary Sociological Theory: Expanding
the Classical Tradition. Fifth edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice
Hall. [TRADITION]
Reserve
Readings in JSTOR
| NOTE:
Throughout this schedule, articles suitable for selection by a resource
person (R) or by a team of presenters (P) are marked
accordingly. |
Course
Schedule:
|
Date
|
Book |
Topics and
Assignments
|
In-Class
Roles |
|
Aug 29
|
Thursday
|
Introduction
to the course and "theory"
|
|
|
|
TRADITION
|
1:1-15
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFE
|
1-5 (introduction);
147-153 (introduction)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 3
|
Tuesday
|
Functionalism
I: Émile Durkheim
|
|
|
|
TRADITION
|
2:16-25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROOTS
|
II (Durkheim):
36-53, 58-65
|
|
|
|
|
6. On Mechanical
and Organic Solidarity
|
R
|
|
|
|
7. What is a
Social Fact?
|
R
|
|
|
|
8. Anomic Suicide
|
R
|
|
|
|
10. The Human
Meaning of Religion
|
P
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFE
|
3 (Durkheimian,
by Hornsby): 73-116
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 10
|
Tuesday
|
Functionalism
II: Parson and Merton, Neofunctionalism
|
|
|
|
TRADITION
|
2:26-66
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROOTS
|
VII (Functionalism):
180-185, 172-179, 192-199
|
|
|
|
|
30. The Functional
Prerequisites of Social Systems, Talcott Parsons
|
P
|
|
|
|
29. The Unanticipated
Consequences of Social Action, Robert K. Merton
|
R
|
|
|
|
32. After Neofunctionalism,
Jeffrey Alexander
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFE
|
5 (Neofunctionalist,
by Colomy & Greiner): 155-196
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 12
|
Thursday
|
Conflict Theory
I: Karl Marx
|
|
|
|
TRADITION
|
3: 67-99
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROOTS
|
I (Marx):5-35
|
|
|
|
|
1. Alienated
Labor
|
P
|
|
|
|
2. Theses on
Feuerbach
|
--
|
|
|
|
3. Manifesto
of the Communist Party (with Friedrich Engels)
|
R
|
|
|
|
4. Commodities
|
R
|
|
|
|
5. The General
Formula for Capital
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFE
|
4 (Marxian,
by Walsh):107-144
|
R
|
|
|
FOUNDERS
|
2 (Harriet Martineau):
23-63
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 17
|
Tuesday
|
Conflict Theory
II: Critical Theory, C. Wright Mills, & Pierre Bourdieu
|
|
|
|
TRADITION
|
3:100-117
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROOTS
|
XIII (Critical
Theory): 357-362, 376-381, 204-209, 419-426
|
|
|
|
|
53. Philosophy
and Critical Theory, Herbert Marcuse
|
P
|
|
|
|
56. The Divergent
Rationalities of Administrative Action, Claus Offe
|
R
|
|
|
|
34. Culture
and Politics, C. Wright Mills
|
R
|
|
|
|
62. Structures
and the Habitus, Pierre Bourdieu
|
P
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 19
|
Thursday
|
Conflict Theory
III: Max Weber
|
|
|
|
TRADITION
|
3: 67-74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROOTS
|
III (Weber):
80-98
|
|
|
|
|
13. Bureaucracy
|
R
|
|
|
|
14. The Nature
of Charismatic Domination
|
R
|
|
|
|
15. Class, Status,
and Party
|
P
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFE
|
2 (Weberian,
by Ritzer): 47-71
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 24
|
Tuesday
|
Conflict Theory
IV: Georg Simmel, Lewis Coser, Ralf Dahrendorf, and Randall Collins
|
|
|
|
TRADITION
|
3:118-153
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROOTS
|
VIII (Conflict
Theory): 112-116, 200-204, 210-225
|
|
|
|
|
18. Conflict
as the Basis of Group Formation, Georg Simmel
|
P
|
|
|
|
33. Functions
of Conflict, Lewis Coser
|
R
|
|
|
|
35. Conflict
Groups and Group Conflicts, Ralf Dahrendorf
|
R
|
|
|
|
36. The Basics
of Conflict Theory, Randall Collins
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFE
|
4 (Simmelian,
by Staudenmeier): 117-146
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sept 26
|
Thursday
|
(Conflict Theory,
continued)
|
|
|
|
FOUNDERS
|
6 (Marianne
Weber): 193-228
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 1
|
Tuesday
|
Macrosociological
Perspectives: Jürgen Habermas and Anthony Giddens
|
|
|
|
TRADITION
|
4: 154-188
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROOTS
|
XV (Giddens):
427-433
|
|
|
|
|
63. The Time-Space
Constitution of Social Systems, Anthony Giddens
|
P
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFE
|
5 (Habermasian,
by Dandaneau):151-182
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 3
|
Thursday
|
(Macrosociological
Perspectives, continued)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 8
|
Tuesday
|
Symbolic Interactionism
I: Weber, Simmel, & Mead
|
|
|
|
TRADITION
|
5: 189-205
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROOTS
|
III, IV, &V:
66-71, 117-120, 130-135, 144-148
|
|
|
|
|
11. 'Objectivity'
in Social Science and Social Policy
|
P
|
|
|
|
19. The Stranger,
Georg Simmel
|
R
|
|
|
|
22. What Pragmatism
Means, William James
|
R
|
|
|
|
24. The Fusion
of the 'I' and the 'Me' in Social Activities, George Herbert Mead
|
P
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 10
|
Thursday
|
Symbolic Interactionism
II: Herbert Blumer
|
|
|
|
TRADITION
|
5: 205-227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROOTS
|
IX (SI): 226-238
|
|
|
|
|
38. Society
as Symbolic Interaction, Herbert Blumer
|
P
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFE
|
7 (Interpretavist,
by Davidson): 283-310
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 15
|
Tuesday
|
Symbolic Interactionism
III: Erving Goffman, Arlie Russell Hochschild, and Patricia Hill
Collins
|
|
|
|
TRADITION
|
5: 227-251
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Arlie Russell
Hochschild, "Emotion work, feeling rules, and social structure."
AJS 85.5 (1979):551-575 [JSTOR article]
[JSTOR Stable
URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0002-9602%28197911%2985%3A3%3C551%3AEWFRAS%3E2.0.CO%3B2-D
]
|
P
|
|
|
|
Erving Goffman,
"The Interaction Order." ASR 83.1 (1983):1-17 [JSTOR
article]
[JSTOR Stable
URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-1224%28198302%2948%3A1%3C1%3ATIOASA%3E2.0.CO%3B2-X]
|
P
|
|
|
ROOTS
|
XII (Feminist):
329-338
|
|
|
|
|
50. Toward an
Afrocentric Feminist Epistemology
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFE
|
8 (Dramaturgical,
by Kivisto & Pittman): 311-335
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 17
|
Thursday
|
(Symbolic Interactionism
III, continued)
|
Initial Draft
Portfolio Due
|
|
|
FOUNDERS
|
5 (Anna Julia
Cooper & Ida B. Wells-Barnett): 149-192
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 19-27
|
|
FALL BREAK!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 29
|
Tuesday
|
Phenomenology
I: Harold Garfinkel
|
|
|
|
TRADITION
|
6: 252-276
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROOTS
|
X (Phenomenology):
254-275
|
|
|
|
|
41. Indirect
Social Relationships, Alfred Schutz
|
R
|
|
|
|
42. Rules of
Conversational Sequence, Harvey Sacks
|
R
|
|
|
|
43. The Rational
Properties of Scientific and Common Sense Activities, Harold Garfinkel
|
P
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oct 31
|
Thursday
|
(Phenomenology
I, continued)
|
Final
memo on criteria due (with defense of choice of theories)
|
|
|
PACKET
|
Hilbert
"Ethnomethodology and the micro-macro order." ASR 55(1990):
794-809 [JSTOR article]
[JSTOR Stable
URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0003-1224%28199012%2955%3A6%3C794%3AEATMO%3E2.0.CO%3B2-E
|
P
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 5
|
Tuesday
|
Phenomenology
II & III: Peter Berger and Dorothy E. Smith
|
|
|
|
TRADITION
|
6:276-292
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Berger
& Thomas Luckman, "Society as a Human Product." Pp.
51-55, 59-61 from The Social Construction of Reality(Garden City,
NY: Anchor, 1966).
|
P
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOUNDERS
|
1("Present
at the Creation"): 1-20
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROOTS
|
VI (Neglected
Voices): 154-164
|
|
|
|
|
26. The Dependence
of Women, Charlotte P. Gilman
|
R
|
|
|
|
27. Utilization
of Women in City Government, Jane Addams
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 7
|
Thursday
|
(Phenomenology,
cont.)
|
|
|
|
ROOTS
|
XII (Dorothy
E. Smith): 339-349
|
|
|
|
|
51. Sociology
from Women's Experience: A Reaffirmation
|
P
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FOUNDERS
|
3 (Jane Addams):
65-104
|
R
|
|
|
|
4 (Charlotte
Perkins Gilman): 105-148
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 12
|
Tuesday
|
Rational Choice
Theories I & II: George Homans and Peter Blau
|
|
|
|
TRADITION
|
7: 293-350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROOTS
|
XI (Rational
Choice): 287-296, 314-320
|
|
|
|
|
45. Social Behavior
as Exchange, George Homans
|
R
|
|
|
|
48. Formulation
of Exchange Theory, Peter Blau
|
P
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Peter Blau,
“A Circuitous Path to Macrostructural Theory.” Annual
Review of Sociology, 21(1995):1-19. [JSTOR article]
[Stable
URL: http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=0360-0572%281995%2921%3C1%3AACPTMT%3E2.0.CO%3B2-Q
]
|
P
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 14
|
Thursday
|
Rational Choice
Theory III: James S. Coleman
|
|
|
|
ROOTS
|
XI (Rational
Choice): 297-304
|
|
|
|
|
46. Human Capital
and Social Capital, James S. Coleman
|
P
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFE
|
6 (Structuralist,
by Prendergast): 197-226
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 19
|
Tuesday
|
Sociology of
the Body
|
|
|
|
TRADITION
|
8:367-382
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROOTS
|
XII (Judith
Butler): 321-328
|
|
|
|
|
49. Subversive
Bodily Acts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROOTS
|
XIV (Michel
Foucault): 389-395
|
|
|
|
|
58. Panopticism
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFE
|
6 (Feminist,
by Lorber): 183-206
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 21
|
Thursday
|
Sociobiology
|
Final essay
due (“clean” & complete)
|
|
|
TRADITION
|
8:382-399
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 26
|
Tuesday
|
Modernism and
Postmodernism, Multiple Perspectives
|
|
|
|
TRADITION
|
9:400-421
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ROOTS
|
XIV (Postmodernism):
396-412
|
|
|
|
|
57. Advertising,
Jean Baudrillard
|
R
|
|
|
|
59. Postmodernity,
or Living With Ambiguity, Zygmunt Bauman
|
R
|
|
|
|
64. Queer-ing
Sociology, Sociologizing Queer Theory, Steven Seidman
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIFE
|
9 (postmodernist,
by Ritzer):261-283
|
R
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nov 28 &
29
|
|
THANKSGIVING
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dec 3
|
Tuesday
|
NO CLASS
|
|
|
Dec 5
|
| |