Instructor:

Martha Voyles

Spring 2002

Office:

Steiner 304

 

Phone:

269-3053

 

Home:

236-8461

 

Syllabus  —  Education 316  —  Math Methods

Text:  Riedesel, Schwartz, Clements,  Teaching Elementary School Mathematics

Jan. 22

Course organization

Read: 

Text - Chap. 1

NCTM Principles and Standards pp. 3-4 (Vision) and pp. 52-71

Jan. 24

Read: 

Good and Grouws, Active Mathematics Teaching, pp. 30-55, 206-212 and handout on Missouri Mathematics Plan

Assignment: 

1)  Make a written list of what you consider to be important goals of mathematics education.  We will compare your lists with that of the Iowa Department of Education, and I will collect them.  A revision of this assignment would be a good one to include in your portfolio (C 3 & 5).

Jan. 29

Read: 

text—chap. 5, pp. 85-104 (early concepts) and pp. 112-129 (single digit addition) and pp. 136-141 (single digit subtraction)

Skemp, Richard (1987).  Psychology of Learning Mathematics, chap. 12, “Relational Understanding and Instrumental Understanding”. Earlbaum.

Leutzinger, Larry.  Strategies for Learning the Basic Facts - pp. 1& 2

NCTM Standards pp. 78-88, 148-156 (Number and Operations)

Skim: 

Mathematics Their Way  (p. 166-67,216,236) and Windows on Mathematics.  Be able to describe the merits and limitations of the two programs using NCTM Standards as the criteria.

Jan. 31

Microteaching: 

Lesson appropriate for kindergarten.  It must meet the needs of those who have mastered simple addition as well as those who are just learning basic number concepts.  The first volume in the Kathy Richardson series is a good resource.  I suggest you file all your lessons in principle D (strategies) along with my evaluation.  Consider cross references to other principles (especially C and E).

Feb. 5

Read: 

text —chap. 3 (Problem Solving) and Wiebe - chap. 20 (Games), Van de Walle pp. 55-59

Copy on problem solving

"Story Problems and Students' Strategies,"  Arith. Teach., May '89, p. 25

NCTM Standards, pp. 116-121, 182-187

Feb. 7

Microteaching: 

Lessons on addition and subtraction 0-19 (unifix, cuisinaire, number line, objects)—first or second grade

Feb. 12

Read: 

text — chap. 5 pp. 104-110 (place value), chap. 6 pp. 129-136 (multidigit addition), 142-152 (multidigit subtraction), chap. 7 pp. 176-182 (place value) and Wiebe - chap. 6 (Estimation)

"Teaching Place Value & Double Column Addition," Arith. Teach., Feb. '88, p. 48,

“Two-Digit Addition and Subtraction:  What Works?” Arith. Teach., Jan. ‘91, p. 10.

Feb. 14

Microteaching: 

Addition and subtraction with regrouping/renaming from concrete to progressively more abstract representations of place value

Feb. 19

Read: 

text—chap. 4 (Culture and individual differences) and chap. 6 - pp.152-174  (multiplication and division)

NCTM Standards pp. 12-14 (Equity) (principle B)

Fennema and Peterson (1987).  Effective teaching for boys and girls.  Talks to Teachers.  New York:  Random House.  (principle B)

Strategies for Learning the Basic Facts - multiplication strategies

"The Dilemma of the Language of Division," ICTM Journal, Spring '89, p. 12

Feb. 21

Microteaching: 

multiplication and division (first lessons)

Resource Notebook due (Feb. 22)

Feb. 26

Read:

text — chap. 7 pp. 182-214 and chap. 14 (see handout for directions on reading)

Handout on manipulatives - “Magical Hopes,” Deborah Ball

Handout on calculator use

Examine Investigations for age group of your choice.  Add two investigations to your notebook.

NCTM Standards - pp. 24-27

Feb. 28

Microteaching: 

multiplication and division —  multidigit

March 5

Read: 

text — chap. 8, pp. 216-230 ( fractions) and chap. 9, pp. 253-265  (decimals)

March 7

Microteaching: 

fractions (paper folding, fraction pieces, number line) and decimals (base 10 blocks, graph paper)

Resource Notebook due (March 8)

March 12

No class. 

First two field experience lessons due.

March 14

No class. 

Rewrite of first two lessons and first draft of next three lessons.

BREAK

April 1

Rewrite of last 3 lessons due

April 1-5

Field experience in the public schools

April 9

Read: 

text — chap. 8, pp. 230-240  chap. 9. pp. 265-269 (adding and subtracting fractions and decimals

April 11

Microteaching: 

adding & subtracting like and unlike fractions and decimals

April 16

Read: 

text chap. 13 (assessment), chap. 8, 240-252 and chap. 9, 269-281 (multiplication and division of fractions and decimals)

NCTM Standards pp. 22-24 (principle G)

April 18

Microteaching: 

multiplying and dividing fractions (paper folding, rods, number line, fraction pieces)

April 23

Read: 

text — chap. 11 and 12  (geometry, spatial reasoning, and measurement)

NCTM Standards, pp. 96-107, 164-175 (read carefully)

April 25

Read: 

NCTM Standards pp. 96-107, 164-175

Assignment: 

Outline a lesson in geometry or measurement

Resource Notebook due (April 26)

April 30

Read: 

Professional Standards for Teaching, pp. 11-15, 35-61 (skip H.S. vignettes) (principle E)

NCTM Standards pp. 108-115, 176-181 (data analysis)

Case study “Establishing a Community of Mathematics Learners”

May 2

Read: 

Ashlock, Error Patterns in Computation, pj. 10-17, Chap. 3, Chap. 4 – errors BF1,AW1,AW3,SW1

Case study “Geometric Thinking”

May 7

Read: 

Case studies “Of-fing Fractions” and “Shea Numbers”

A Collection of Performance Tasks and Rubrics – P. 49-55

NCTM Standards - p. 15-21, 38 -47

May 9

Read:

Case study “Multiplication Clipes”

Errors MW2,MW3,DW1,DW4,SF3,DF1

Skim: 

Assessment by NCTM

Education 316:  Math Methods

Text:  Riedesel, Schwartz, Clements,  Teaching Elementary School Mathematics

Supplemental References:

Barody, Arthur J., Fostering Children’s Mathematical Power.  New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1998.

This text provides an explanation of using cuisenaire rods to model operations with fractions, and it provides a plot synopsis of useful children’s literature.  You might also find some of its investigations interesting.

Burns, Marilyn, Cuisinaire.  Sausalito, CA: Math Solutions, 1995

This series has lots of good ideas for place value multiplication and division concepts.  An inexpensive set you might like to purchase.

Fendel, Daniel M., Understanding the Structure of Elementary School Mathematics.  Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1987.

This is an old book, but it gives a lot of mathematical information from a conceptual perspective rather than the more usual organization of topics by the order they are presented in school.  The first seven chapters contain a very useful perspective on mathematics.  The “pedagogical comments” section in each chapter is excellent.  I would recommend that you read at least the portions of the book that apply to topics you will teach during student teaching.

Good, Thomas L., Grouws, Douglas A., and Ebmeier, Howard.  Active Mathematics Teaching.  New York: Longman, 1983.

This is a complete summary of the Missouri Mathematics Effectiveness Project.  It presents the results of several research projects at different grade levels.  While it is dated, the project was based on well established learning principles that still hold and are included in more recent projects.  Although the emphasis may seem to be less constructivist than the NCTM Standards, I think most of the principles apply to all types of lessons, and I do not think it is the author’s intent to discourage constructivism.

Hatfield, M.M., Edwards, N.J. and Bitter, G.G., Mathematics Methods for the Elementary and Middle School.  Boston: Allyn and Bacon, 1993.

The features of this text that I would like to call your attention to is the “common misconceptions” for each topic in math.  I is also a good source of games and activities.

Krulik, S. and Rudnick, J.A., Problem Solving, A Handbook for Teachers (1987) and Problem Solving, A Sourcebook for Teachers (1984).

This is a good source of problems and while I would not suggest you teach problems by type, it can be useful to have a resource that provides them by type.

Labinowicz, Ed, Learning from Children.  Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley, 1985.

Older but good for its ideas about interviewing students and examples of student work and possible student responses.

Leutzinger, Larry, Strategies for Learning the Basic Facts.  Iowa: Iowa Council of Mathematics Teachers, 1981.

This is excellent and will probably cause you to reorganize your teaching if you have a traditional text.  It is well worth the $3.00.

Richardson, Kathy, Developing Number Concepts.  New Jersey: Dale Seymour, 1999.

This three volume series has lots of good lesson ideas for K-4 mathematics.  You might well want to purchase these inexpensive volumes.

Trafton, Paul and Thiessen, Diane, Learning Through Problems.  Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann, 1999.

A wonderful book from a staff development workshop for primary teachers.  Shows student work and teacher reflections.  It is very short and a must read.

Troutman, Andria P. and Lichtenberg, Betty K., Mathematics, A Good Beginning.  Monterey, California: Brooks/Cole Publishing, 1991.

One of the strengths of this text strengths is the excellent activities and resources at the end of each chapter that you might like to include in your resource notebook.  It also has some good masters of things like graph paper in the appendix.

Wiebe, James H.  Teaching Elementary Mathematics in a Technological Age.  Scotsdale, Arizona: Gorsuch Scarisbrick, 1988. 

This text does an excellent job talking about the merits of various concrete models especially for place value.  It also has good criteria for games and a good section on estimation.

Van de Walle, John, Elementary and Middle School Mathematics.  New York: Longman, 2001.

This is in many ways the best mathematics methods text available.  I have chosen to have you read about many of its ideas in the primary research instead of in a text, but I suggest you get in the habit of consulting this text as you prepare lessons.  It is clear, succinct, completely up-to-date and it has excellent examples of how to teach.  When I assign pages in this text, you would often benefit from examining the entire chapter.  He has excellent subheadings and inserts them often, so it is easy to skim and find what you want.  His technology notes are a good source for notebook inclusion and the sections on children’s literature are another useful feature.

Grade:   Your grade in this class will be determined in the following manner:

Class participation and daily assignments

20%

Microteaching

50%

Resource Notebook

10%

Final Project

20%

Resource Notebook

Your notebook should have three major sections:  1) early concepts, addition and subtraction, 2) multiplication and division, 3) decimals and fractions.  You should separate the sections with tabs for each section.  There is no one best way to organize your notebook, but as a minimum I make the following suggestions.

  1. Put only one idea on each page.
  2. Put a clear category heading (from the list below) on each page so it is easy to skim and find what you want.
  3. Include a complete reference for each idea (APA style).
  4. Add your own evaluations and opinions about the use of an idea.
  5. It may be more efficient to copy an idea than summarize it.  If you glue something in your notebook, use rubber cement.

Each of your sections should include the following items.

  1. Summary (with or without copy) of relevant articles (2 or 3) from Teaching Children Mathematics or the older title Arithmetic Teacher (indexes are in the issues)
  2. Two games that meet the criteria we have studied for good games.  Note how it meets the criteria.
  3. One estimation activity that meets the criteria we have studied.
  4. One calculator activity.
  5. One computer program review - try one of the programs in the curriculum library and write a one paragraph review about it (file under principle J)
  6. Two problem solving ideas - include routine and non-routine problems
  7. One project idea
  8. Miscellaneous - newspaper articles, career information, stories, cartoons, puzzles (minimum of 4 pieces)
  9. Microteaching lesson plans

Your notebook will be graded on completeness, usefulness, quality and quantity.

Due dates:  February 22, March 8, April 26

Microteaching

Prepare a written lesson plan for each microteaching session.  Your plan should be complete enough that I can understand it even if you do not present it.  If your independent practice requires a worksheet, attach a copy to your lesson plans or give the page number and assignment you would make from a text.  Do not write your own worksheet unless you are unable to find anything suitable.  It is more efficient (and realistic) to adapt an existing text worksheet than to design your own.  See p. 51 of Van de Walle.  Please type your lesson plans.

Every lesson should include:

1.  Warm-up - This can be review and/or set the stage for the day’s lesson.  It must, however, get the students’ attention and actively involve all the students.  In this case active involvement means that the activity requires an overt response from every student.  Calling on students one by one is not a way to involve everyone in making an overt response.

2.  Development - This is the body of the lesson.  It may include a brief review of prerequisite skills especially if that was not accomplished in the warm-up.  It should include a statement of the objective - usualy at the beginning of the lesson.  It must include checking for understanding (usually an oral spot check of a few students) and guided practice (check on the entire class).  You should write out the questions you intend to ask during development and possible right and wrong answers.  You should usually progress from predominantly product questions to an increasing number of process questions.  For initial product questions you should provide the explanation that you will later ask in a process question.  These guidelines apply to inductive/constructivist lessons as well as to direct instruction.

3.  Independent Practice - Every lesson must have some independent work in which which students get to practice.  This can be a traditional worksheet, an activity, or a cooperative learning task, but there must be individual accountability.  It isn’t necessary that there be a product for the teacher to collect although most often that will be the case.


Grinnell College Home Page | Education Home Page
This page last modified by pricel 06/26/2002